7
H index
4
i10 index
148
Citations
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz | 7 H index 4 i10 index 148 Citations RESEARCH PRODUCTION: 29 Articles 8 Papers RESEARCH ACTIVITY:
MORE DETAILS IN: ABOUT THIS REPORT:
|
Works with: Authors registered in RePEc who have co-authored more than one work in the last five years with Christian Klamler. | Is cited by: | Cites to: |
Journals with more than one article published | # docs |
---|---|
Social Choice and Welfare | 6 |
Economics Bulletin | 6 |
Mathematical Social Sciences | 4 |
Theory and Decision | 2 |
Economic Theory | 2 |
European Journal of Political Economy | 2 |
Group Decision and Negotiation | 2 |
Working Papers Series with more than one paper published | # docs |
---|---|
MPRA Paper / University Library of Munich, Germany | 7 |
Year | Title of citing document |
---|---|
2024 | On the Weighted Top-Difference Distance: Axioms, Aggregation, and Approximation. (2024). Principi, Giulio ; Crippa, Ludovico ; Aveni, Andrea. In: Papers. RePEc:arx:papers:2403.15198. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |
2024 | A new social welfare function with a number of desirable properties. (2024). Hou, Fujun. In: Papers. RePEc:arx:papers:2403.16373. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |
2024 | A solution for abstract decision problems based on maximum flow value. (2024). Gori, Michele. In: Mathematical Social Sciences. RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:130:y:2024:i:c:p:24-37. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |
2024 | Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference?. (2024). Laslier, Jean-Franois ; Lachat, Romain. In: European Journal of Political Economy. RePEc:eee:poleco:v:81:y:2024:i:c:s0176268024000077. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |
2024 | Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference?. (2024). Laslier, Jean-François ; Lachat, Romain. In: Post-Print. RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04630321. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |
2024 | Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference?. (2024). Laslier, Jean-François ; Lachat, Romain. In: PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint). RePEc:hal:pseptp:halshs-04630321. Full description at Econpapers || Download paper |
Year | Title | Type | Cited |
---|---|---|---|
2003 | A comparison of the Dodgson method and the Copeland rule In: Economics Bulletin. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 5 |
2003 | Kemenys rule and Slaters rule: A binary comparison In: Economics Bulletin. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 2 |
2008 | Antipodality in committee selection In: Economics Bulletin. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 1 |
2009 | A simple ultrafilter proof for an impossibility theorem in judgment aggregation In: Economics Bulletin. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 5 |
2014 | How risky is it to manipulate a scoring rule under incomplete information? In: Economics Bulletin. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 0 |
2014 | A note on evaluating freedom of opinion In: Economics Bulletin. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 0 |
2004 | The Dodgson ranking and the Borda count: a binary comparison In: Mathematical Social Sciences. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 4 |
2009 | Maximizing the minimum voter satisfaction on spanning trees In: Mathematical Social Sciences. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 1 |
2010 | A note on maximizing the minimum voter satisfaction on spanning trees In: Mathematical Social Sciences. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 1 |
2012 | Committee selection under weight constraints In: Mathematical Social Sciences. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 1 |
2010 | An equity-efficiency trade-off in a geometric approach to committee selection In: European Journal of Political Economy. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 1 |
2019 | Evaluative voting or classical voting rules: Does it make a difference? Empirical evidence for consensus among voting rules In: European Journal of Political Economy. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 7 |
2017 | Consensus in the 2015 Provincial Parliament Election in Styria, Austria: Voting Rules,Outcomes, and the Condorcet Paradox In: Graz Economics Papers. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | paper | 0 |
2017 | Election outcomes under different ways to announce preferences: an analysis of the 2015 parliament election in the Austrian federal state of Styria In: Public Choice. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 7 |
2005 | Borda and Condorcet: Some Distance Results In: Theory and Decision. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 4 |
2011 | Finding socially best spanning trees In: Theory and Decision. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 0 |
2009 | The undercut procedure: an algorithm for the envy-free division of indivisible items In: MPRA Paper. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | paper | 14 |
2012 | The undercut procedure: an algorithm for the envy-free division of indivisible items.(2012) In: Social Choice and Welfare. [Full Text][Citation analysis] This paper has nother version. Agregated cites: 14 | article | |
2010 | Divide-and-conquer: A proportional, minimal-envy cake-cutting algorithm In: MPRA Paper. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | paper | 2 |
2011 | N-Person cake-cutting: there may be no perfect division In: MPRA Paper. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | paper | 7 |
2013 | Two-Person Fair Division of Indivisible Items: An Efficient, Envy-Free Algorithm In: MPRA Paper. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | paper | 6 |
2014 | An algorithm for the proportional division of indivisible items In: MPRA Paper. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | paper | 0 |
2014 | How to divide things fairly In: MPRA Paper. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | paper | 2 |
2015 | Maximin Envy-Free Division of Indivisible Items In: MPRA Paper. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | paper | 6 |
2017 | Maximin Envy-Free Division of Indivisible Items.(2017) In: Group Decision and Negotiation. [Full Text][Citation analysis] This paper has nother version. Agregated cites: 6 | article | |
2015 | Sharing the Cost of a Path In: Studies in Microeconomics. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 0 |
2006 | A distance-based comparison of basic voting rules In: Central European Journal of Operations Research. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 5 |
2005 | On the Closeness Aspect of Three Voting Rules: Borda – Copeland – Maximin In: Group Decision and Negotiation. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 4 |
2003 | Transitive closure, proximity and intransitivities In: Economic Theory. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 6 |
2005 | The Copeland rule and Condorcet’s principle In: Economic Theory. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 7 |
2008 | Proportional pie-cutting In: International Journal of Game Theory. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 11 |
2014 | Knapsack cost sharing In: Review of Economic Design. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 4 |
2004 | The Dodgson ranking and its relation to Kemeny’s method and Slater’s rule In: Social Choice and Welfare. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 14 |
2007 | The traveling group problem In: Social Choice and Welfare. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 2 |
2008 | A distance measure for choice functions In: Social Choice and Welfare. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 16 |
2016 | Proportional Borda allocations In: Social Choice and Welfare. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 1 |
2019 | Using the Borda rule for ranking sets of objects In: Social Choice and Welfare. [Full Text][Citation analysis] | article | 2 |
CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Last updated February, 4 2025. Contact: CitEc Team